Identify Discuss Three Explained for Students (Easy Guide)
Understanding this question requires applying core subject principles.
What This Question Is About
This question relates to identify discuss three and requires a structured academic response.
How to Approach This Question
Break the problem into smaller parts and analyze each logically.
Key Explanation
This topic involves identify discuss three. A strong answer should include explanation, application, and examples.
Original Question
identify and discuss three (3) takeaways from the literature review Overall, there is a general consensus in the literature on how to define FSC in industry. Authors agree that FSC is something beyond a procedural FSMS and that rules and regulations are insufficient to ensure the safety of the food; leaders and employees in organizations that handle food must have a set of values and beliefs dedicated to ensuring safe food. However, a dearth of literature exists on FSC outside of the organizational context, perhaps because the concept of FSC itself draws upon theories of organizational culture. As a result, there is a gap in the literature about what a strong and effective FSC would look like among consumers. Similarly, most literature on FSC does not consider the diversity of employees’ political, familial, racial, or other cultural identities, and that these identities may influence an organization’s FSC. Generally, researchers agree on the determinants of a strong and effective FSC: leadership; communication; commitment to food safety; risk awareness; environment; accountability; and employee knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and values. The literature describes the importance of each in creating and maintaining a strong FSC. The literature describes some best practices for creating and maintaining a strong food safety culture, however there are a minimal number of tools or toolkits designed specifically to help the food industry with creating and promote an effective FSC. There is also very little on how government agencies can promote a strong FSC across the food supply chain. Also, researchers in the literature reviewed assess an organization’s FSC by building and expanding upon earlier assessment tools. The tools share several constructs (echoing the key determinants of FSC described above), including leadership, communication, risk awareness, infrastructure or resources, and individual values or commitment. However, more research is needed to assess the validity of these tools within different organizational settings as well as across different locations around the globe. While only a few studies have directly examined the relationship between FSC and outcomes, the research to date suggests that improving FSC within organizations will improve food safety. More empirical studies are needed to fully demonstrate the connection between FSC and outcomes, including microbiological environment and other risks for foodborne illness outbreaks, reductions in contamination incidents, and improved economic effects.
******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."
