Get Answer: Need Help With Question Guide

This question tests key academic concepts commonly covered in coursework.

What This Question Is About

This question relates to need help with and requires a structured academic response.

How to Approach This Question

Start by identifying the main issue, then apply relevant academic frameworks.

Key Explanation

This topic involves need help with. A strong answer should include explanation, application, and examples.

Original Question

I need help with the research article appraisal part two, it is different than the one that was sent. This is a new article one with new questions. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uta.edu/10.22038/jmrh.2021.60589.1728 Reference Hashemzahi, M., Khayat, S., & Khazaeian, S. (2022). Effect of covid-19 self-care training telemedicine on perceived stress and corona disease anxiety in pregnant women: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Midwifery & Reproductive Health, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uta.edu/10.22038/jmrh.2021.60589.1728 Research Article Appraisal, Part Two Assignment This week, you will continue to appraise the instructor-assigned article that you began reading in Module 1 (See Module 2 Research Article Appraisal, Part One for review of the assignment.) Submission Instructions: A major skill that is learned in this course is how to critically read and appraise nursing research articles according to the guideline found in your textbook. The purpose of appraising an article is to critically evaluate the research process followed by the author(s) of the assigned article. This is an information-intensive, time-intensive process that is not learned overnight. To demonstrate your skill at appraising an article, you will complete this open-book assignment. Here’s how you should approach completing this week’s assignment to begin appraising an article: 1. First, do your assigned reading in Gray and Grove (2021) each week. This will introduce you to the critique skills you will need for the week. 2. Skim the entire instructor-assigned research article that has been posted on CANVAS in Module 1 Reading and on the assignment so that you will have an idea of what it is about. For this week, re-read carefully the introduction/literature review /theoretical framework and methods sections of the article again. 3. Print the Research Article Appraisal, Part Two Assignment and find the best answer to each question based on your Gray and Grove (2021) assigned readings and on what you have read in the instructor assigned research article. 4. Some of the questions in the appraisal assignment below will seem unfamiliar to you. Look up key terms from the questions in your textbook. Some examples of these terms might be problem statements, hypotheses, or variables. You can also look in Chapter 18 for an example of a critical appraisal of a quantitative research article. 5. You will write your answers for this assignment using the paper guideline found below. Leave the questions in your assignment and answer them accordingly. Do not write as a paper. Use complete sentences and correct grammar. NO QUOTES ARE ALLOWED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT as this is to be your appraisal of the content. Refer to APA to assist you. Answer every question. Cite the article at least once. Once completed, upload your assignment to the assignment submission link by the time and date listed on the Course Schedule. 6. Feedback will be provided after all assignments for this week have been entered for credit. Your assigned article for an appraisal is: Hashemzahi, M., Khayat, S., & Khazaeian, S. (2022). Effect of COVID-19 self-care training via telemedicine on perceived stress and corona disease anxiety in pregnant women: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 10(1): DOI:10.22038/jmrh.2021.60589.1728 Your questions for this weeks appraisal are here: Research Article Appraisal, Part Two Actions Rubric Research Appraisal, Part Two Criteria Ratings This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeasurement Tools 15 to >13.0 pts Accomplished • Identify and describe the instrument(s) (dependent variable) used to measure the major study variables (research or dependent variable[s]). 5 pts • Identify the level of measurement (LOM) achieved by each instrument. 5 pts • Discuss the psychometric properties (reliability & validity of questionnaires/scales or precision & accuracy of physiologic measures) of instrument(s) used in this study (authors’ description of instruments’ past reliability/validity & reliability/validity from current research). 5 pts 13 to >6.0 pts Competent Only partial discussion of measurement tools, administration of measurement tools, completion of measurement tools, scoring of measurement tools, reliability and validity, physiological measures, and instrument development. 6 to >0 pts Needs Improvement No discussion of measurement tools, administration of measurement tools, completion of measurement tools, scoring of measurement tools, reliability and validity, physiological measures, and instrument development. Any item not discussed will receive 0 points This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection 10 to >8.0 pts Accomplished • Describe data collection procedures used in the study. 5pts • Discuss clarity of description of data collection process. 1 pt • If more than one data collector was used for the study, describe the training of the data collectors and how/whether interrater reliability was adequately assessed/ensured. 4 pts 8 to >3.0 pts Competent Only partial discussion of data collection, data collectors, and training (IRR) 3 to >0 pts Needs Improvement No discussion of data collection, data collectors, and training (IRR). Any item not discussed will receive 0 points This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis 20 to >16.0 pts Accomplished • List the statistical procedures performed to describe the sample. 5 pts • List the statistical procedures performed to answer the research question(s). 5 pts • Discuss appropriateness of statistical procedures for the LOMs of data collected. 2 pt • Did the researcher(s) address the management of problems with missing data? 1 pt • What level of significance (alpha) was set for this study? 2 pt • Discuss the clarity of presentation of study results (if tables or figures were used, briefly describe them & discuss if/how they made the presentation more understandable). 5 pt 16 to >6.0 pts Competent Only partial discussion of descriptive and inferential statistics, statistics used, level of significance, and tables/figures, missing data management. 6 to >0 pts Needs Improvement No discussion of descriptive statistics, statistics used, level of significance, and tables/figures. Any item not discussed will receive 0 points This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearchers Interpretation of the Findings 20 to >16.0 pts Accomplished • Describe the key findings of the study in relation to purpose/question/hypothesis. 3 pt • Discuss the clarity of the authors’ explanation of key findings, including statistically significant & non-significant findings. 4 pts • Discuss whether the key findings were clinically significant/clinically important. 3 pt • Describe which findings were consistent with those expected, which findings were unexpected. 3 pt • What implications for practice were identified by the authors? 4 pt • What suggestions for future studies were identified by the authors? 3 pt 16 to >6.0 pts Proficient Partial discussion of key study findings, significance, author’s expectations, clinical significance, limitations, generalizability, implication, and future research 6 to >0 pts Needs Improvement No discussion of key study findings, significance, author’s expectations, clinical significance, limitations, generalizability, implication, and future research Any item not discussed will receive 0 points This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLegal & Ethical Issues 10 to >8.0 pts Accomplished • Briefly discuss institutional review board approval for the study. 4 pts • Explain how ethical principles of research (beneficence, justice, & respect for human dignity) were followed to protect subjects’ rights (freedom from harm, privacy, autonomy, & disclosure). 3 pts • If the study included subjects from a vulnerable population, were additional safeguards used to protect them? 3 pts 8 to >3.0 pts Competent Only partial discussion of IRB, principles of research, and effect on vulnerable populations. 3 to >0 pts Needs Improvement No discussion of IRB, ethical principles of research, or vulnerable population needs. Any item not discussed will receive 0 points This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation 15 to >13.0 pts Accomplished • Discuss at least two strengths of the study. 5 pts • Discuss at least two weakness of the study and whether/how that weakness could have been corrected. 5 pts • Based on the previous research presented in the ROL and the findings of the study presented in this article, discuss whether the findings are ready for use in practice. 5 pts 13 to >3.0 pts Competent Partial discussion of the overall evaluation of the study. Only one strength or weakness discussed. 3 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Significant lack of discussion of the overall evaluation of the study. No strengths or weaknesses, no suggestions identified for future study. Any item not discussed will receive 0 points. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Writing Style and Format 10 to >8.0 pts Accomplished Reference list included. Uses professional and orderly presentation of ideas (full sentences, precision, clarity, format, grammar, spelling, & punctuation) with appropriate citation of sources. Use the APA guidelines throughout this paper. Up to 0.5 points will be deducted for each grammar, spelling, punctuation, or format error. NO USE OF QUOTES 8 to >3.0 pts Competent Missing elements of APA. Paper too long. 3 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Any APA item not specifically mentioned will have points deducted. Use your resources! Total Points: 100 PreviousNext Research Article Appraisal, Part Two Legal & Ethical Issues Briefly discuss institutional review board approval for the study. Explain how ethical principles of research (beneficence/harm, justice, privacy, and autonomy) were followed to protect subjects, if that was explained or implied. If the study included subjects from a vulnerable population as described in the textbook, describe any additional safeguards used to protect them. Measurement Tools Fill out the table below for the major variables in the study (NOT demographic variables). You can add rows as needed, depending on how many measurement tools were used. Boxes can be expanded for more content. Name of Tool (Author, year) Level of Measurement Reliability reported Validity reported Data Collection Describe data collection procedures described in the study. Include who collected the data, at what time points, and how data was collected. Evaluate how clearly and completely the procedures were described. If more than one data collector was used for the study, describe the training of the data collectors, and how/whether interrater reliability was adequately assessed. Data Analysis List the statistical procedures performed to describe the sample or demographic variables. List the statistical procedures performed to answer the research question(s) or main study variables. Discuss the appropriateness of the statistical procedures for the level of measurement of the data collected. Utilize the statistical decision tree in the textbook, Chapter 21, Fig.21.7. Describe how the researcher(s) addressed any problems with missing data, if they did. Describe the level of significance (alpha) set for this study. Discuss the clarity of the presentation of study results (e.g. if tables or figures were used, clear description, etc.). Researcher Interpretation of Findings Describe the key findings of the study in relation to the purpose statement or hypotheses. Evaluate the clarity of the authors’ explanation of key findings, including statistically significant & non-significant findings. Discuss whether the key findings were clinically significant or clinically important. Describe which findings were consistent with those expected, and any which were unexpected in your opinion. Describe the implications for practice identified by the authors. Summarize the suggestions for future studies (research) identified by the authors. Overall Evaluation of the Entire Study Discuss two strengths of the study. Discuss two weaknesses of the study, and how each weakness could have been corrected. Based on the previous research presented in the literature review and the findings of the study presented in this article, discuss whether the findings are ready for use in practice. Reference List

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."