Get Answer: Social Determinant Health Question Guide
This type of question evaluates analytical and critical thinking skills.
What This Question Is About
This question relates to social determinant health and requires a structured academic response.
How to Approach This Question
Use appropriate theories and support your answer with clear reasoning.
Key Explanation
This topic involves social determinant health. A strong answer should include explanation, application, and examples.
Original Question
1-As a social determinant of health, a patient’s socioeconomic situation has an impact on their wellness by limiting their access to critical health and lifestyle services, which can impair value-based care success. Because QSEN enables nurses to reinvent the ‘What’ and ‘How’ they give nursing care so that they can ensure high-quality, safe care, a patient’s socioeconomic position does not limit the treatment they receive from nurses. This ensures that people with poor socioeconomic status receive health treatment. It also aids nurses in identifying and closing gaps between what is and what should be. When healthcare executives examine patient data to develop a treatment plan that includes patient-centered care, cooperation and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality improvement, safety, and informatics. If a patient is being offered unfair treatment or payment alternatives, you can fight for better treatment and payment options for the patient at the health care center. You can also recommend improvements to an established medical process or for an entire group of patients, addressing the social determinants of health in order to improve general health and reduce health inequities, which are frequently founded in social and economic disadvantages. At the political/legislative level, engaging with health care institutions, altering legislation, initiating ballot initiatives, conducting direct collective action, and, when necessary, litigation. 2-Growing up with a mother who works in the hospice industry, I have many heard horror stories about patients who have had extremely uncomfortable deaths, because their provider kept treating a patient long after it was ineffective. Death is very personal, and some people (which is their right) don’t believe in hospice- but I believe it is unethical for providers not to, at least, refer a patient (and/or the patient’s family) for a hospice consult, once treatment is no longer effective. I’m not aware of any specific laws defining terminal patients, and what constitutes harm regarding treatment – but I believe this needs to be something codified. In Campos-Calderón’s study, of 202 terminal patients (108 male/94 female) only 47.1% of females (vs 52.9% of males) were registered as terminal patients (Campos-Calderón, 2016). This number isn’t exactly glaring in a study of 94 women, but if a larger study is done, that represents a lot of women, who aren’t even offered a choice in their end of life plan. One way that I could advocate for patients like this, is to spread awareness among my peers in healthcare. Even in healthcare, there is a misconception that “hospice kills people” – hospice doesn’t euthanize patients, hospice provides comfort care for patients to peacefully pass. Another way I could advocate for these patients is to start the discussion among nursing organizations. Nursing organizations can be very politically involved, and I could suggest this topic for the next rally.
******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."
