How to Answer Acknowledge Contribution Person Questions (Complete Guide)

This question tests key academic concepts commonly covered in coursework.

What This Question Is About

This question relates to acknowledge contribution person and requires a structured academic response.

How to Approach This Question

Start by identifying the main issue, then apply relevant academic frameworks.

Key Explanation

This topic involves acknowledge contribution person. A strong answer should include explanation, application, and examples.

Original Question

A- Acknowledge the contribution of the person to whom you are responding. B- Build on the ideas of the original poster by adding your own thoughts or analysis. C-Contribute to the discussion by asking a probing question that deepens understanding of material and/or provides a supplemental resource. Include scholarly references (for the last 5 years) with DOI or a link. Cite them in the statements. I have been involved in task groups in two distinct settings: a skilled nursing facility as a Social Service Director and a grass-roots community organization as a team lead in support of an HIV/AIDS fundraising walk. In my professional experience, a Team Conference task group in a skilled nursing facility includes the patient, family members, the interdisciplinary team, which includes the Activity Director, Dietitian, Nursing, the attending physician, and Therapy Director (speech, physical, occupational). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandates that care plan meetings are conducted by the Interdisciplinary Team every quarter. It is the responsibility of the Social Service Director to send out invitations and update the staff of the scheduled meeting. The Team Conference Meetings are conducted every quarter to discuss a resident’s care plan, progress, goals, and objectives by ensuring everyone involved is aligned and the resident’s needs are being addressed. This is also the opportunity for the resident to self-advocate and or the family to speak in support of the resident’s well-being, to ask questions, and make changes to the care plan that is specifically tailored to the patient’s personal preferences. Each team member has the opportunity to speak on current issues, behaviors, medication changes, ancillary referrals (dental, vision, audiometry, and mental health), past updates, healthcare concerns, etc. This meeting can last from 15 minutes to 1 hour. However, it is the Social Service Director to brings the meeting to a close with a summary of key action items, assignment of responsibilities, and scheduling of the next meeting. The facilitator will ensure all relevant points have been addressed and the family and patient have the direct contact information from each Interdisciplinary Team member for follow-up. As the Team Lead for a fundraising walk, the dynamics were most definitely different then the Interdisciplinary Team task group. The office staff had to recruit team members to contribute to fundraising efforts such as bake sales, raffles, soliciting businesses and private citizens for donations, and car washes. The team consisted of organizational staff such as health educators, case managers, accounting clerks, peer support, a volunteer coordinator, counseling and testing staff, nursing, and all department directors. The task group meetings were held monthly to brainstorm and organize fundraisers (Zastrow & Hessenauer, 2018). The purpose of the meetings was to solicit volunteers to help orchestrate, adjust, or fine-tune fundraising efforts, and to report how much had been received in donations as a motivator for others. To keep momentum, a team member was chosen once a month as the highest fundraiser for the month and was given a gift card to a local restaurant. News flyers were printed and disseminated to team members to stay updated on fundraising efforts, assignments, winners, and locations of scheduled events. It was not the most organized group, it was not a mandatory attendance, and everyone did not everyone participated, but the few who did kept it moving. Working with a fundraising task group was a lot of fun, and the overwhelming community support was amazing. In conclusion, my team raised over 70K and won as the team that raised the most money for the entire fundraising walk campaign. The group composition was structured for the Interdisciplinary Team task group and their presents were required, but not so much for the fundraising task group. No participation was required, and people donated their free time, efforts, and income to participate in a cause that advocated for others. The Interdisciplinary Team was much more organized and structured, whereas the fundraising group was not at all. However, the fundraising team had a lot more excitement, enthusiasm, and energy. Zastrow, C., & Hessenauer, S. L. (2018). Empowerment series: Social work with groups: Comprehensive practice and self-care (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN-13: 9781337567916

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."