Working Pitch Presentation Assignment Help: How to Answer This Question

This question tests key academic concepts commonly covered in coursework.

What This Question Is About

This question relates to working pitch presentation and requires a structured academic response.

How to Approach This Question

Start by identifying the main issue, then apply relevant academic frameworks.

Key Explanation

This topic involves working pitch presentation. A strong answer should include explanation, application, and examples.

Original Question

I’m working on the pitch presentation for the health promotion initiative assessment, but I’m finding it difficult to choose a topic that clearly fits the requirements. I want to make sure the initiative is novel, focused on one clear strategy, and aligns with the assessment criteria — especially around innovation, theory, and health promotion principles. I’d really appreciate any guidance or clarification to help me move forward confidently with the task. “Pitch Presentation Plus Questions (30%) Pitch Presentation Plus Questions (30%) Pitch Presentation Plus Questions Weight: 30% Type of Collaboration: Individual Due: WEEK 9 – THURSDAY 1ST MAY by 9AM Submission: Via Turnitin Format/Curriculum Mode Rapid presentation (3 minutes maximum) to pitch a health promotion initiative idea plus 2 minutes of questions to explore underlying health promotion principles and values relating to the proposed initiative. The questions will be designed to help your thinking for preparing your Proposal assessment. Length: 3 minutes plus 2 minutes for questions Rationale Health promotion professionals need to pitch their initiative ideas to communities, stakeholders and collaborators and funders. To do this effectively pitches need to succinctly and accurately describe the need for health promotion initiatives and what initiatives consist of using health promotion concepts and terminology. They also need to be able to understand their initiative and the rationale for it enough so, so that they can answer on the spot questions from those listening to their pitch to defend their initiative ideas. Task You are to deliver a rapid, pitch-presentation in 3 minutes to describe a novel health promotion initiative to address health or wellbeing issue of interest to you. NOTE you are not to describe an initiative that has already been delivered and published on – you need to be pitching a new and novel initiative that builds on what has previously been published on in the literature and is underpinned by principles and values of health promotion. You will submit your slides to Turnitin for your pitch-presentation by the deadline and will present your pitch-presentation in class. The tutor and/or audience will have 2 minutes to ask you questions about your initiative, particularly if there are elements about it that are unclear. The object of these questions will be to support you in developing your initiative further for the Proposal assessment. Elements to include in your pitch are: – Background (e.g., what is the issue, how big is it and who is most affected) – Underlying theories and/or previous health promotion strategy/ies that show promise for targeting this issue – The health promotion strategy/ies that you are proposing and how this/they are different to previous initiatives You will be assessed on: – The significance/relevance of the topic and target audience chosen – The critiquing of previous literature on health promotion strategies to target the issue – The innovativeness of your proposed initiative – Your presentation of and ability to answer questions relating to the above, including communication skills, conciseness, use of health promotion terminology and concepts – The alignment of the proposed health promotion initiative with principles and values of health promotion and sound ethical practice. Resources: Read widely on previous health promotion initiatives for the given topic you are focusing on to get ideas for strategies that you could propose in your health promotion initiative.Before commencing your assignment, you should conduct a thorough literature search of journal articles to inform your health promotion initiative (eg create a PICO and run database searches). Make sure to cite this work in your assignment to show that your work is evidence-based. Do not use the topics included in the examples provided in exemplars in class – if you do you will automatically score ‘0’ for this assessment. Criteria HD D C P U Description of the significance/relevance of the health or wellbeing issue and the target audience (20 marks) Health or well-being issue significance and specifically within the target audience was very well described, highlighting the need for a health promotion initiative. (17-20 marks) Health or well-being issue significance and specifically within the target audience was well described, highlighting the need for a health promotion initiative. (15-16.9 marks) Health or well-being issue significance and specifically within the target audience was described, highlighting the need for a health promotion initiative. (13-14.9 marks) Health or well-being issue significance but not always clearly within the target audience described, or not completely clear of the need for a health promotion initiative. (10-12.9 marks) Health or wellbeing issue significance not described or not described clearly. Target audience not described or not described clearly. (0-9.9 marks) Critique of previous literature on health promotion strategies to target the issue (20 marks) Very thorough critique highlighting the gaps in current health promotion strategies/models/ theories and the advances in health promotion strategies/models/ theories for this issue and/or in the target audience. (17-20 marks) Thorough critique highlighting the gaps in current health promotion strategies/models/ theories and the advances in health promotion strategies/models/ theories for this issue and/or in the target audience. (15-16.9 marks) Appropriate critique highlighting the gaps in current health promotion strategies/models/ theories and the advances in health promotion strategies/models/ theories for this issue and/or in the target audience. (13-14.9 marks) Critique highlighting some gaps in current health promotion strategies/models/ theories and some advances in health promotion strategies/models/ theories for this issue and/or in the target audience. (10-12.9 marks) No critique or poorly described critique of the gaps in current health promotion strategies/models/ theories and no or poorly described advances for this issue and/or the target audience. (0-9.9 marks) Innovativeness of the proposed initiative (20 marks) Very clearly described initiative that mapped back to addressing the identified gaps in existing literature and that very clearly highlighted the novelty of the proposed initiative. (17-20 marks) Clearly described initiative that mapped back to addressing the identified gaps in existing literature and that clearly highlighted the novelty of the proposed initiative. (15-16.9 marks) Appropriate description of the initiative that mapped back to addressing the identified gaps in existing literature and that highlighted the novelty of the proposed initiative. (13-14.9 marks) Some description of how the initiative mapped back to addressing the identified gaps in existing literature and that highlighted some of the novelty of the proposed initiative. (10-12.9 marks) No or poorly described attempt at highlighting the novelty of the proposed initiative and how it addressed the identified gaps in current literature. (0-9.9 marks) Presentation skills and ability to answer questions (20 marks) Excellent communication skills (e.g., eye contact with the audience and no notes, engaging tone) and slides (e.g. use of images, font text large enough to read clearly, not too much text). Presentation was concise and within time limit. Excellent use of health promotion terminology and concepts. Excellent answers to posed questions. (17-20 marks) Very good communication skills (e.g., eye contact with the audience and no notes, engaging tone) and slides (e.g. use of images, font text large enough to read clearly, not too much text). Presentation was concise and within time limit. Very good use of health promotion terminology and concepts. Very good answers to posed questions. (15-16.9 marks) Good communication skills (e.g., eye contact with the audience and no notes, engaging tone) and slides (e.g. use of images, font text large enough to read clearly, not too much text). Presentation was concise and within time limit. Good use of health promotion terminology and concepts. Good answers to posed questions. (13-14.9 marks) Communication skills were good throughout the majority of the presentation and questions (e.g., eye contact with the audience and no notes, engaging tone) and slides (e.g. use of images, font text large enough to read clearly, not too much text). Presentation was concise and within time limit. Some use of health promotion terminology and concepts, although may have not always been appropriate or accurate. Some good points within answers to posed questions. (10-12.9 marks) Poor communication skills and/or slides were hard to follow. Presentation was over time limit. No or incorrect use of health promotion terminology and concepts. No or very poor attempt at answering questions. (0-9.9 marks) Health promotion initiative’s underpinning in principles and values of health promotion and sound ethical health promotion practice (20 marks) Very clearly described initiative in terms of its grounding in sound ethical practice based on the principles and values of health promotion. Very good consideration of principles and values and sound ethics in answers to questions posed. (17-20 marks) Clearly described initiative in terms of its grounding in sound ethical practice based on the principles and values of health promotion. Good consideration of principles and values and sound ethics in answers to questions posed (15-16.9 marks) Clearly described initiative in terms of its grounding in sound ethical practice based on the principles and values of health promotion. Some consideration of principles and values and sound ethics in answers to questions posed (13-14.9 marks) Described initiative in terms of its grounding in sound ethical practice based on the principles and values of health promotion but may have had some inaccuracies. Some consideration of principles and values and sound ethics in answers to questions posed but may not have always been accurate (10-12.9 marks) No attempt or poor attempt at describing the initiative in terms of its grounding in sound ethical practice and based on principles and values of health promotion. No attempt at considering ethical practice, principles or values of health promotion when answering questions (0-9.9 marks) “

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."